>
全球变化生态实验室
首页|实验室概况|科研团队|实验平台|科研项目|科研成果|新闻动态|交流与合作|实验风采|重大研究计划项目|English
文章内容页
当前位置: 首页>>科研成果>>2009>>正文
Species diversity and productivity: why do results of diversity-manipulation Experiments differ from natural patterns?
  审核人:

作者:Jiang, L., S. Wan, and L. Li.

期刊:Journal of Ecology

年份:2009

卷号:97:603-608

文章摘要

1. Experiments that directly manipulate species diversity often report a positive diversity effect on productivity, whereas observations of natural communities reveal various productivity–diversity relationships and nutrient addition to natural plant communities generally results in negative productivity–diversity relationships.

2. We hypothesize that this apparent paradox may be potentially explained by the reduced roles of complementarity and positive selection effects, and the increased importance of competitive exclusion in natural communities compared to diversity-manipulation experiments. This hypothesis arises from the difference in species distribution and abundance patterns between immature synthetically assembled communities in diversity-manipulation experiments and more mature natural communities.

3. Our hypothesis applies best to small-scale studies within homogenous habitats and complements the environmental heterogeneity hypothesis that explains diversity–productivity patterns across heterogeneous habitats.

4. Synthesis. Our analysis highlights important differences between synthetic communities in diversity-manipulation experiments and natural communities that may translate into different diversity–productivity patterns, and cautions against indiscriminate extrapolations of results of diversity-manipulation experiments to natural communities.

全文链接

关闭窗口

版权所有:全球变化生态学实验室

elementnameelementnameelementname